Thursday, December 29, 2011
Naama Margolese, the eight-year-old Israeli girl, whose routine humiliation by ultra-Orthodox Israelis
But you won't be hearing from them any time soon the way this story is being presented.
Coming on the heels of the unprecedented and largely secular protests this past summer in Tel Aviv and other cities to press for affordable housing and "social justice" more broadly,and the recent attacks by extremist settlers against Israeli soldiers, this latest conflict has led many mainstream news outlets to talk of a continuing "religious war" in Israel, pitting secular and moderately religious Jews against an increasingly assertive, militant and expanding ultra-Orthodox sector.
"It doesn't matter what I look like, someone should be able to walk around in sleeveless shirts and pants, and be able to walk down the street and not be harassed," the young girl's Chicago-born mother, Hadassa, explained.
Of course, Palestinians couldn't agree more. But somehow, the vast majority of the Israeli and Western mainstream media seems unaware of the obviously parallels between the treatment of Naama Margolese and Israeli girls and women more broadly by ultra-Orthodox, and the treatment of millions of Palestinians by Israel. Even the most recent Haaretz editorial criticising the growing militarism and violence of the ultra-Orthodox did not mention Palestinians.
In fact, as unpleasant as are the images of a young Jewish girl being screamed and even spit at by Israeli Jewish Taliban, it is still preferable from the point of view of Israel's propaganda efforts to being confronted with heartrending images of Jews attacking Palestinians, never mind religious settlers attacking of young Palestinian children, which is a routine occurrence in the Occupied Territories.
It is ironic that today Jewish-on-Jewish conflict is, from a certain perspective, preferable (at least at the level of spectacle) to Jewish-Palestinian conflict, because for several decades, part of the accepted wisdom surrounding the unwillingness of Israelis to reach a viable peace agreement with Palestinians was that doing so would lead to an untenable level of conflict, and even civil war, within Jewish Israeli society.
The alternative to focusing on this story would be a focus on Israeli High Court's determination on Tuesday that Israel can continue to exploit Palestinian mines and other resources for the benefit of Israelis, even though this is a direct contravention of international law. Or to read an email about a young Palestinian boy, so frightened by Israeli soldiers who have given his family 10 minutes to get their belongings out of their house before it's to be demolished that he stood, shivering outside, wetting his pants. The list goes on and on; all of it, tragically, far worse than the already deplorable hatred and discrimination that Naama has daily faced, just for being a girl.
Sacred women
The Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben has described the figure of the "homo sacer", or sacred man, who from ancient Rome to the Middle Ages, and again today, is considered completely outside the law and deprived of all rights of citizenship. He can therefore be killed with impunity, not merely by representatives of the state (the police or army, for example), but by anyone.
Jews and Roma during the Holocaust are the modern epitome of the homo sacer, as are, to a greater or lesser degree, all colonised people, including - and particularly, today, Palestinians, as the South African theorist Achille Mbembe has shown in his work on necropolitics as well as Irish human rights scholar John Reynolds.
But there is a specific manner in which what I would term the "femina sacra", or sacred woman, is also a primary object of violence, whether in Israeli, Palestinian, Egyptian or most other societies for that matter. The much publicised recent army and police violence against women in Egypt is a good example of how, once the general public loses fear of state violence, the state must press even harder by specifically attacking the repository of honour and values - female citizens - as a way of attempting to break down the resistance of society as a whole. (Of course, it rarely works).
Israeli President Shimon Peres declared solemnly that Israelis are "fighting for the soul of the nation and the essence of the state", while a member of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party declared that the harassment the young girl faces "have no place in sane and moderate Judaism". Excluding women from the full rights of citizenship or the realisation of their humanity - at least as that humanity has come to be nearly universally accepted and codified in international law - is, as one sign held up by a female protester in Bet Shemesh against the ultra-Orthodox put it, "my red line".
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu declared: "Israel is a democratic, Western, liberal state... In a Western liberal democracy, public space is open and safe for all - men and women alike - and has no room for any harassment or discrimination."
Neither western nor liberal
Of course, Netanyahu is lying. Israel is not democratic in any meaningful sense if one considers that millions of Palestinians under its control for decades have been deprived of citizenship and its attendant rights - a society in which anyway, from elderly man to young girl can become "sacred" - that is, outside the bounds of civilised law, at any moment. Nor is it Western in any meaningful sense in that it has honoured the core ideal of Western modernity largely in the breach (which, of course, only makes it a microcosm of the West writ large). And while gays might have rights - at least in Tel Aviv, for now - it cannot be considered liberal from any perspective when it so thoroughly violates the rights of millions of people.
But as long as Palestinians are absent from the conversation, as long as the focus is on Naama Margolese and the reprehensible conduct towards her, then the fiction that there is still a struggle to be had for Israel's "soul" can be maintained.
Of course, for some adult ultra-Orthodox women in Beit Shemesh, being forced to the back of buses and being prevented from walking on the same side of the street as men or being attacked for not dressing modestly enough is not a problem. "I feel uncomfortable when men look at me," one woman declared in explaining why she doesn't mind being segregated away from men.
We can debate whether the woman who isn't bothered by segregation or the back of the bus is making a free judgment, or has been so cowed by living in an extremely patriarchal and repressive community that she has internalised male dominance to the point of accepting it as both a given and a source of protection - just as so many Muslim women accept and even defend their second class status in countries across the region. But free adults at least have, in theory, a choice. Naama Margolese has clearly not been socialised into the values of this community, and feels frightened and excluded by what its members are trying to impose on her.
Recognising shared oppression
As her mother complained, "they" want to "push us out of" and "take over the city".
This is, of course, a lament which untold numbers of Palestinians can appreciate, from residents of Jaffa pushed out to make way for expensive condominiums to Bedouins whose villages remain unrecognised when their lands aren't being further expropriated to the millions of Palestinians across the Green Line and in exile.
If Israel is to have a chance at surviving as some approximation of the "Jewish democratic state" envisioned by its founders, Jewish Israelis, like Hadassa Margolese and the protesters on behalf of her daughter, or the J20 protesters this summer who took to the streets in huge numbers for "social justice", are all going to have to accept that the injustices against which they are fighting are inseparable from the injustice their society as a whole continues to inflict, far more intensely, upon Palestinians.
I won't get my hopes up for the adults accepting and acting upon this reality any time soon. But as she grows up, we can hope that Naama's firsthand experience of exclusion, oppression, bigotry and even hatred, will help her see the equal humanity of the Israeli Other - Palestinians - more fully than her parent's generation has been able to do.
If that can happen, then however unacceptable Naama Margolese's experience, it will have prepared her for the even greater struggle for full democracy for all the people, men and women, Israelis and Palestinians, living between the River and the Sea, that will soon enough be her generation's to assume.
Mark LeVine is a professor of history at UC Irvine and senior visiting researcher at the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies at Lund University in Sweden. His most recent books are Heavy Metal Islam (Random House) and Impossible Peace: Israel/Palestine Since 1989 (Zed Books).
Courtesy:Al Jajeera
Thursday, October 13, 2011
87-year-old Chinese activist and journalist has been released
PUBLISHED ON SUNDAY 25 SEPTEMBER 2011.
Reporters Without Borders is worried to learn that the Chinese authorities are holding a group of journalists from the South Korean daily JoongAng Ilbo on suspicion of spying. Arrested near China’s border with North Korea on 20 September, they were reportedly travelling on tourist visas.
“We demand an explanation of this arbitrary detention of a group of journalists whose number has not been confirmed,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Press visas are hard to get and, when journalists lack them, the Chinese authorities often use this as grounds for preventing them from working in this sensitive border area. We call on the authorities to release them without delay.”
According to a report in the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo, the JoongAng Ilbo group consisted of four journalists, the head of a Seoul-based government transport research centre and a local guide. Chinese soldiers arrested them in a supposedly restricted military zone near the River Tumen, which forms the border with North Korea.
South Korean foreign ministry officials told Associated Press on 23 September that the JoongAng Ilbo journalists had been held in a hotel since their arrest near the border. Without saying exactly how many were being held, the officials said the journalists were travelling on tourist visas.
The Chinese authorities do not like foreign reporters visiting the area near the North Korean border. A South Korean freelance journalist, Seok Jae-hyun, was arrested in 2003 for filming North Korean refugees fleeing to China and was held for 14 months on a charge of “trafficking in human beings"
9,000 children have gone missing in Uganda -Where child sacrifice is a business
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Dalai Lama missing from party as South Africa's anti-apartheid icon and critic TUTU of its government turns 80
Known as "The Arch", Tutu is a much-loved figure in his country, mostly for the role he played in ending apartheid.
Friday's birthday celebration, however, was not without controversy.
Earlier in the week he branded South Africa's government, which is led by the African National Congress party, "worse than apartheid" over suspicions that a delay in issuing a visa to Tibet’s Dalai Lama was due to pressure from China.
As a result, the Dalai Lama was unable to attend Tutu’s celebration, but still delivered a message wishing the archbishop well.
Among those in attendance were Graça Machel, Nelson Mandela's wife, and Bono, lead singer of Irish rock band U2.
Sparked debate
Al Jazeera's Tania Page, reporting from Johannesburg, said that Tutu's stinging attack on the government had sparked debate over the current government’s political direction.
Page said that the spat had highlighted "Tutu's ongoing relevance as the country's moral compass".
Susan Booysen, political analyst at the University of the Witwatersrand, said, "He has the gravitas, like no other leader, to say things and be heard.”
South Africans interviewed by Page said that the icon still symbolised perseverance and achievement for the country.
"There's still one person who still has the guts to challenge the government which we're living under, so it's a good thing what he did," said one interviewee.
Another South African interviewed said, "I hope to grow as old as him and to achieve as many things as he did in our country."
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Eight Bangladeshi migrants have been beheaded in the Saudi Arabian capital Riyadh.
The men who crashed the world
Friday, September 23, 2011
Pakistan
'backed Haqqani attack on Kabul '
- Mike Mullen
Analysis

Thursday, September 22, 2011
Law to decriminalize attempt to commit suicide in India-Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Sikkim are not in agreement
This was indicated to the Delhi high court on Wednesday by the Central government, in response to a PIL seeking removal of section 309 of the Indian Penal Code that punishes attempt to suicide with one-year simple imprisonment or fine or both.
"Stand-alone amendment to remove section 309 of IPC may not be possible. The government plans a comprehensive amendment in a year's time to the IPC, the CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code) and the Evidence Act that will include considering Law Commission's recommendation to delete section 309," Central government counsel Jatan Singh told a bench of chief justice Dipak Misra and justice Sanjiv Khanna.
Sources in the home and law ministry confirmed that decks have been cleared to propose removal of this section. Views were sought from the states as law and order is a subject on the concurrent list.
Of the 29 state governments approached, 25 have agreed to the proposal. Since criminal law falls in the concurrent list, as it deals with law and order, the approval of a majority of state governments is seen as a clincher for the Parliament to pass an amendment.
Only governments of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Sikkim are not in agreement with the proposal, while J&K has responded that the IPC is not applicable to them. Singh also submitted a note prepared by the home ministry that states, "A view has already been taken to consider recommendation of the Law Commission for deletion of 309 IPC during the next batch of comprehensive amendment to the IPC."
The note, dated September 19, assures the court that the government is serious about the issue and adds three Parliamentary standing committees on home affairs have advocated need to "reform and rationalize" the criminal law of the country by introducing a comprehensive legislation in Parliament instead of bringing amendment bills in piecemeal. Courtesy: Times of India
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Govt of India bends 70%, Anna seeks 90% : The all-party meeting called by the government on Wednesday
The olive branch came just before the government agreed to consider Team Anna's demand to put the Prime Minister under the Lokpal's purview and merge the CBI's anti-corruption wing with the proposed ombudsman. The government has agreed to enact the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill to deal with corruption in higher judiciary. Government agreed that this legislation would be vetted by the Hazare group.
The sticking points are: Civil society's demand to include the lower bureaucracy in the Lokpal's ambit, enacting Lokayuktas for states, extending Lokpal's jurisdiction to cover the conduct of MPs inside Parliament, adoption of a citizen's charter by every government department that lays down the duties of officials and punishments for non-performance.
The civil society has asked the government to give a commitment in writing that the Lokpal Bill will be passed in the current session itself after withdrawing the official bill from the standing committee or allowing it to lapse.
The government, which described the talks as "fruitful", plans to respond tomorrow. It will discuss the issue at an all-party meeting the Prime Minister has called tomorrow. Singh will also review the situation at a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs.
Last Thursday, TOI had suggested precisely this as a solution to the logjam, but members of the government and Congress had at the time indicated that it wasn't a feasible idea. On Tuesday, however, it chose to be flexible.
In fact, there was a clear attempt to de-escalate tension, with the government and Team Anna appearing to move closer to an understanding on two contentious issues. During the talks through the day, the government indicated that it was ready to put the PM within the Lokpal's jurisdiction with riders to protect the top office from motivated allegations. The Hazare camp appeared to agree that corruption in higher judiciary should dealt with a proposed law on judicial standards and accountability.
Although talks will continue on Wednesday and the issue will be discussed at the all-party meeting in the afternoon, the possibility of an early resolution looked slim with Hazare insisting on carrying on with his fast and asking that the Lokpal Bill be sent directly to Parliament, skipping Standing Committee scrutiny.
While finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, the government's chief negotiator, termed the talks "fruitful", representatives of Anna Hazare - Prashant Bhushan , Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi - tried not to encourage hopes of a breakthrough.
More crucially, Hazare insisted on carrying on with his fast despite the growing risk of damage to his kidneys and in defiance of advice from his doctors. Addressing the crowds at 9.10 pm, he said he had refused medical advise to take an IV drip, and was ready to die for country. He also warned against attempts to remove him forcibly, asking protestors assembled at the maidan to form a barrier if "any government people come here".
The leader also indicated that the government should hurry up on reaching an agreement in view of his health parameters. "Doctors are saying there is some damage to my kidneys, but my inner voice has told me and I should not be scared of death," he said.
The fast ensured that the civil society faction continued to hog sympathy just after the government through the PM's letter tried to seize the initiative in the battle of wits. The move sought to achieve multiple objectives: From expressing concern over Anna's falling health to counter the perception of cussedness to pull off an image makeover by appearing to be a partner in the fight against graft rather than an adversary.
But there was an attempt to disarm the Hazare group of their chief grouse: That the proceedings in Parliament will be rigged since it will not get to discuss the Jan Lokpal Bill at all. Faced with the allegation that they did not believe in parliamentary supremacy, the civil society faction said that their real quarrel was that the government had fixed the parliamentary proceedings. Seeking to blunt the plank, government strategy was to ensure that Team Anna was completely on board on the move to refer the Jan Lokpal Bill to the standing committee, even if this clearly means that not all of its provisions would be accepted. A middle ground had to be clearly defined, as the government does not want to face a fresh stir later.
However, Hazares' determination to carry on with his protest ensured there was no respite for the government. His insistence to call off his fast in defiance of medical advice will ensure that Anna camp continues to hog sympathy, while putting the government in a fix over how to deal with what threatens to be big political headache. While the political cost to government of a dip in Anna's health cannot be exaggerated, it also has to factor in how the attempt to forcibly hospitalize the septuagenarian.
The PM's conciliatory letter in which he voiced concern about Anna's health, was the most critical part of a larger and concerted move through Tuesday by the government to engage with Team Anna.
Changing its earlier tack of using intermediaries to talk to Team Anna, law minister Salman Khurshid met with Anna lieutenant Arvind Kejriwal in the first direct contact between the two sides on Tuesday afternoon. Later in the evening, Team Anna and the government met at finance minister Pranab Mukherjee's office.
Singh's letter and a quiet meeting between law minister Salman Khurshid and Team Anna leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Akhil Gogoi led to a formal exchange at the office of finance minister Pranab Mukherjee. Mukherjee, named Prime Minister's chief negotiator, met Kejriwal, who was accompanied by Kiran Bedi and Prashant Bhushan. Khurshid was also present.
The all-party meeting called by the government on Wednesday will try to draw the response on parties on how far they will back the peace initiatives. The government is quite prepared to recast the Lokpal law substantially but wants parties to indicate where they stand on contentious issues like inclusion of lower bureaucracy, higher judiciary and conduct of MPs in Parliament.
On Tuesday, we front-paged a TIMES APPEAL. And we are heartened to see the first signs of thaw. But the peace process has only just begun; the last thing the nation wants or needs is for it to be derailed. We're therefore taking the unusual step of re-running the Appeal, because it will be as relevant tomorrow as it was yesterday...
TIMES APPEAL : Last Thursday, The Times of India offered three solutions (while acknowledging the legal/constitutional roadblocks to each one of them) to break the logjam: (1) a referendum; (2) an MP introduces Team Anna's draft as a private member's bill and Parliament debates both the government and the Jan Lokpal versions; (3) the issue be referred to an eminent persons' committee. We would not be so immodest or foolish as to believe that a better solution does not lie outside of the three proposed by TOI. But there can be no second opinion on the need to find common ground. Both the government and Team Anna claim to be doing what they're doing "for the people". If that be so, neither side should allow ego to come in the way of a solution that best tackles the curse of corruption and serves the cause of India and its people. This is a moment in our history that calls for humility and guts, not hubris or bravado.
TIMES VIEW: Even those who disagree with the form of Anna's protest cannot quarrel with the cause, or with the nationwide public upsurge he has created. But now that the government has agreed to formally refer the Jan Lokpal Bill to the standing committee of Parliament, he should call off his fast before his health deteriorates any further. The fight is far from over, and he needs to preserve his energy for the road ahead. Source:Times Of India
Virginia earthquake rattles East Coast;No major injuries or extensive damage were reported after the 5.8-magnitude earthquake






What's next for Libya and the national council? Three questions on Libya - Opinion
A six month NATO-aided rebellion in Libya has advanced on the capital, Tripoli, in an effort to oust 42-year leader Muammar Gaddafi. Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's senior political analyst, comments on three key issues. What's next for Libya and the national council? It is time for the Libyan people to celebrate the end of a four-decade dictatorship. Once they sober up from the jubilations of their well-deserved victory, however, they will discover this is only the beginning. Gaddafi has undermined, marginalised or obliterated many of the state institutions, including the military, and destroyed the political parties - indeed, political life in the country. There is much to restore and more to build from scratch. Security, reconstruction and political transition are only a few of the challenges they will face sooner rather than later. More importantly, they will need to manage expectations of those who have given their all for liberty, freedom and prosperity. Having said that, there is no need for alarm. Not yet any way. It's easy, even clichéd, to be pessimistic, even negative, about the post-revolutionary challenge. What is needed is optimism anchored in reality. And judging from what we have seen over the past five months, there is much to celebrate in terms of building a steering council and creating locally based revolutionary groups from the bottom up that have been well coordinated and largely disciplined. There have been disagreements and suspicion over the past several weeks, and the full story of the assassination of Abdul Fatah Younis is yet to emerge. And yes, there have been certain violations and acts of revenge, but considering the pent-up tensions and violence after decades of dictatorship and its terribly criminal behaviour throughout the past few months, these have been the exceptions to the rule. The revolution has been a pluralistic, all-encompassing coalition of people from all walks of life. They paid attention to local and tribal sensitivities and established an excellent coordination strategy between the local revolutionaries and the national steering committee. Unlike in Egypt and Tunisia where pillars of the regime, notably the military, remain in power, the Libyan revolution is set to wipe the slate clean and begin anew. Democracy is its only way to success. The transitional council must remember its role is just that – transitional - and avoid all tactics that prolong its unchecked authority. You mentioned Egypt and Tunisia. What do the Libyan developments mean for the Arab Spring? Libya is much smaller and relatively less developed than its neighbours Egypt and Tunisia. It also has much on its plate and will be preoccupied with its own internal affairs for years, even decades, to come. That's why one doesn't expect the new leaders in Tripoli to play any major regional role in the near future. However, the revolutionary contagion will only accelerate after the success of the revolution in Libya. The Assad and Saleh regimes should have much more to worry about today than last week as the latest revolutionary domino falls. Under pressure from their people, the Arab regimes are going to have to act. Yemen is next, and Syria, while more complicated, will have to follow suit. The same is true for the rest of North Africa. As a necessary bridge between Egypt and Tunisia, oil-rich Libya could play an important role in coordinating the three countries' future reconstruction strategies and their relations with the rest of the region and with the West. What about the Western powers - notably France, Britain and the US - where does the 'success' in Libya take them? First and foremost Western leaders need to wipe that smug look from their faces and make sure not to gloat about doing the Arabs any favours. Certainly the NATO aerial bombardment did help, but this was a revolutionaries' victory par excellence. The battle was won first and foremost in the hearts of the Libyans, just as with the Egyptians and Tunisians before them. Besides, after decades of complicity with Arab dictators, Western powers have much to make up for: They inserted themselves in the Libyan revolution after Gaddafi made genocidal threats against his people, but their interference was not necessarily motivated by humanitarian ends, rather more of the same geopolitics that led to befriending Gaddafi, Ben Ali and Mubarak in the first place. Syria is far more complicated and Britain and France will need to keep out of it militarily. That's not to say that the Libyans should be unappreciative for the extended helping hand. Better to have Western powers on the right side of Arab history for a change. And there is much room for cooperation and coordination in the future, but it should be done on the basis of mutual respect and mutual interest, especially that of the Arabs who are in every need of affirmative action. Western leaders must also steer away from driving a wedge between those whom they consider moderates and others deemed "Islamists", as Libya will need cooperation among all its citizens.
|
Source: Al Jazeera |